Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.25 seconds)Section 115 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Satyawati Sharma (Dead) By Lrs vs Union Of India & Another on 16 April, 2008
In Satyawati Sharma Vs. Union of
India, 2008 (5) SCC 287 it has been held,
"The premises let out either for residential or
commercial purposes can be got vacated by the
landlord for bonafide requirement".
Mohan Lal vs Tirath Ram Chopra And Anr. on 14 May, 1982
17. Present petition has been filed under Section 25B (8) of the Act.
A Full Bench of this Court in Mohan Lal Vs. Ram Chopra and
another, 1982 (2) Rent Control Journal 161 exhaustively considered
the provisions of Section 25B of the Act. On the scope of the proviso
to sub-section (8) of this Section, after examining the judgment of
Supreme Court in Hari Shanker and others.
Shri Nem Chand Daga vs Shri Inder Mohan Singh Rana on 7 September, 2001
In Nem Chand Daga Vs. Inder Mohan Singh Rana,94 (2001)
Delhi Law Times 683; it was held;
Frank Anthony Public School vs Amar Kaur on 3 October, 1983
In Frank Anthony Public School Vs. Smt. Amar Kaur, 1984
(6) Delhi Reported Judgment 47, it was held;
Sarwan Dass Bange vs Ram Prakash on 29 January, 2010
In Sarwan Dass Bange Vs. Ram Parkash, 2010 IV AD (Delhi)
252, observations made by Supreme Court in Baldev Singh Bajwa Vs.
Monish Saini, (2005) 12 SCC 778 have been quoted as under;
Baldev Singh Bajwa vs Monish Saini on 5 October, 2005
In Sarwan Dass Bange Vs. Ram Parkash, 2010 IV AD (Delhi)
252, observations made by Supreme Court in Baldev Singh Bajwa Vs.
Monish Saini, (2005) 12 SCC 778 have been quoted as under;
John Impex (Pvt.) Ltd. vs Dr. Surinder Singh And Ors. on 5 December, 2006
In M/s John Impex (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Dr. Surinder Singh & Ors.
135 (2006) Delhi Law Times 265 this Court held;
M/S.Sait Nagjee Purushotham & Co.Ltd vs Vimalabai Prabhulal & Ors on 4 October, 2005
In Sait Nagjee Purushotham & Co. Ltd. Vs. Vimalabai
Prabhulal and Others, (2005) 8 Supreme Court Cases 252; the
Court observed: