Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (1.95 seconds)
A. Revanth Reddy, Hyd vs State Of Telangana Ano on 26 February, 2021 cites

Kedar Nath Singh vs State Of Bihar on 20 January, 1962

The trial Court has to examine the case, frame appropriate charges and then proceed against the petitioner-accused. In order to prove the innocence or otherwise of the petitioner-accused, the petitioner- accused is required to undergo trial in the subject Calendar Case. Therefore, it is not a fit case to quash the proceedings in 1 (1997) 7 SCC 431 2 2017 Law Suit (Hyd) 55 3 Crl.P.No.2894 of 2015 Dr.SA,J 4 Crl.P.No.3653 of 2015 the subject Calendar Case as prayed for. Learned Public Prosecutor, in support of his submissions, relied on Kedar Nath Singh v. State of Bihar4, Pravasi Bhalai Sangathan v. Union of India5, Vinod Dua v. Union of India6 and Ghanshyam Sharma v. Surendar Kumar Sharma7.
Supreme Court of India Cites 33 - Cited by 194 - B P Sinha - Full Document

Pravasi Bhalai Sangathan vs U.O.I. & Ors on 12 March, 2014

The trial Court has to examine the case, frame appropriate charges and then proceed against the petitioner-accused. In order to prove the innocence or otherwise of the petitioner-accused, the petitioner- accused is required to undergo trial in the subject Calendar Case. Therefore, it is not a fit case to quash the proceedings in 1 (1997) 7 SCC 431 2 2017 Law Suit (Hyd) 55 3 Crl.P.No.2894 of 2015 Dr.SA,J 4 Crl.P.No.3653 of 2015 the subject Calendar Case as prayed for. Learned Public Prosecutor, in support of his submissions, relied on Kedar Nath Singh v. State of Bihar4, Pravasi Bhalai Sangathan v. Union of India5, Vinod Dua v. Union of India6 and Ghanshyam Sharma v. Surendar Kumar Sharma7.
Supreme Court of India Cites 52 - Cited by 41 - B S Chauhan - Full Document

Ghanshyam Sharma vs Surendra Kumar Sharma & Ors on 26 August, 2014

The trial Court has to examine the case, frame appropriate charges and then proceed against the petitioner-accused. In order to prove the innocence or otherwise of the petitioner-accused, the petitioner- accused is required to undergo trial in the subject Calendar Case. Therefore, it is not a fit case to quash the proceedings in 1 (1997) 7 SCC 431 2 2017 Law Suit (Hyd) 55 3 Crl.P.No.2894 of 2015 Dr.SA,J 4 Crl.P.No.3653 of 2015 the subject Calendar Case as prayed for. Learned Public Prosecutor, in support of his submissions, relied on Kedar Nath Singh v. State of Bihar4, Pravasi Bhalai Sangathan v. Union of India5, Vinod Dua v. Union of India6 and Ghanshyam Sharma v. Surendar Kumar Sharma7.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 9 - Full Document
1   2 Next