Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.25 seconds)M/S Michigan Rubber(I) Ltd vs State Of Karnataka & Ors on 17 August, 2012
Reference may be
made to the judgment relied by the learned senior counsel for the petitioners in the
case of " Michigan Rubber (India) Limited" (supra) wherein para 35, the Hon'ble
Supreme Court has held as under:
Uflex Ltd. vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu on 17 September, 2021
In the case of "Uflex Ltd"(supra) relied by learned
senior counsel for the petitioners the Hon'ble Supreme Court has clearly held that if
there is less participation than necessary, it cannot be said that terms and conditions
of the tender have been violated to somehow one of the party. This judgment is not
helping the petitioners rather this judgment is helping to the respondents.
State Of Jharkhand & Ors vs M/S Cwe-Soma Consortium on 12 July, 2016
17. The judgement relied by the learned senior counsel for the petitioners in
"CWE-Soma Consortium" (supra) has not interfered with and in that case the
order of the Division Bench of the High Court was reversed by the Hon'ble Supreme
Court. It is mentioned that it is within the domain of the State not to provide tender
to a single bidder. This judgment is on different fact and not helping the petitioners.
The petitioners have not participated in e-Auction. However, after completion of
entire process of e-Auction tender, the petitioners have filed the present writ petition
before this Court.
Rajeev Suri vs Delhi Developement Authority on 18 February, 2019
In the case of 'Rajeev Suri' (supra) issue of locus standi has
already been considered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. In the case in hand, the facts
of the case of the petitioners are same with that of judgment.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 39 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Meerut Devt.Authority vs Association Of Management Studies & Anr on 17 April, 2009
16. The judgement relied by the learned senior counsel for the petitioners in
para 26 in the case of "Meerut Development Authority" (supra), in the same
paragraph it has been held that a limited of judicial review may be available in cases
12
where it is established that the terms of the invitation to tender were so tailor made to
suit the convenience of any particular person with a view to eliminate all others from
participating in the bidding process. In the case in hand, the petitioners have not been
able to show how the respondent no. 4 has been favoured by JSMDC. This judgment
is also not helping the petitioners.
Article 298 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
1