Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (1.20 seconds)Section 191 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 193 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 200 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 195 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
P.S.K. Haji Sait Muhammad Abdul Gaffur ... vs K.E.S. Muhammad Samsuddin Rowther And ... on 3 September, 1924
27. Before parting with the order, it is pertinent to mention that
the certified copy of litigation i.e. CS No. 50355/2016 titled as
Mohd. Abdul Hai Vs. Mohd. Irshad and Ors. mentioned the
address of husband of objector as "Mohd. Irshad, H.No.
S-18/18B, Batla House, Joga Bai Extension, Near Mumtaz
Masjid Complex, Jamia Nagar, Okhla" while the address of suit
property is S-18/18, Ground Floor with Terrace right (front side
portion) measuring 28 sq. yard, situated near Mumtaz Masjid,
Part of Khasra No. 427/260, Situated at Joga Bai Extension,
Jamia Nagar, Delhi. Interestingly, in the said matter the DHs
Mohd. Abdul Hai has mentioned the suit property as property no.
S-18/18, Batla House, Joga Bai Extension, Jamia Nagar,
measuring 25 sq. yard and thus, it seems that objector is not in
possession of suit property and the warrants of possession might
have been executed at the wrong property number. Moreover, it
has also come on record that the suit property is part of Khasra
No. 427/260 and JD no. 1 and his father have sold small pieces
out of this khasra number, therefore, DHs are directed to file the
demarcation report issued from the concerned SDM concerned to
prove the identity of the suit property for effective execution of
warrants of possession.
Section 101 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 103 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
The Right to Information Act, 2005
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
1