Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.25 seconds)
( Mostak Seikh vs The State Of West Bengal And Others on 14 March, 2011 cites

S.N. Mukherjee vs Union Of India on 28 August, 1990

In that case the Court explained and discussed the contra decision passed in the case S.N. Mukherjee vs. Union of India, reported in (1990) 4 SCC 94 by explaining the said decision that in case of affirmation, no reason separately required to be given as held in S.N. Mukherjee (supra) should be read as an observation meaning thereby that order of affirmation need not contain any elaborate reasoning as contained in original order, but it cannot be understood to mean that even brief reason need not be given in order of affirmance.
Supreme Court of India Cites 37 - Cited by 1274 - S C Agrawal - Full Document

State Bank Of Bikaner & Jaipur & Ors vs Shri Prabhu Dayal Grover on 19 September, 1995

The Court further explained in that case the earlier case of State of Bikaner and Jaipur vs. Prabhu Dayal Grover, reported in (1995) 6 SCC 279, since in the case Prabhu Dayal Grover (supra), it was observed that for affirmative order there was no necessity of giving any reason to this effect that the observation of the Prabhu Dayal Grover (supra) should be read as that the Appellate Authority should disclose briefly application of mind as without any reason it cannot be satisfied. It has been further held at least that brief reason should be given so that one can know that the Appellate Authority has applied his mind.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 121 - M K Mukherjee - Full Document

State Of West Bengal And Anr vs Alpana Roy And Ors on 26 September, 2005

In the case State of West Bengal vs. Alpana Roy, reported in (2005) 8 SCC 296 on considering the cases, namely, Breen (supra), Amalgamated Engineering Union Limited (supra) and Alexander Machinery (Dudly) Ltd. vs. Crabtree, reported in 1974 ICR 120 (NIRC), in para 8 the Court held "reasons substitute subjectivity by objectivity. The emphasis on recording reasons is that if the decision reveals the unscrutable face of 4 sphinx, it can, by its silence render it virtually impossible for the Courts to perform their appellate function or exercise the power of judicial review in adjudging the validity of the decision. Right to reason is an indispensable part of a sound judicial system, reason at least sufficient to indicate an application of mind in the matter before the Court".
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 37 - A Pasayat - Full Document
1   2 Next