Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 22 (0.43 seconds)The Limitation Act, 1963
Section 5 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
M/S B And T Ag vs Ministry Of Defence on 18 May, 2023
48.3 The arbitrator shall have full powers to review
and/or revise any decision, opinion, direction,
certification or valuation of the Engineer in
accordance with the Contract, and neither party
shall be limited in the proceedings before such
Engineer for the purpose of obtaining the said
decision.
Section 21 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Vidya Drolia vs Durga Trading Corporation on 14 December, 2020
In my view, the said course of action is not desirable in view of the
decisions of the larger Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SBP &
Co. v. Patel Engg. Ltd.(supra) and Vidya Drolia (supra), that it would
be more appropriate to leave that question to be decided by the arbitral
tribunal on taking evidence.
Union Of India And Ors vs Har Dayal on 24 November, 2009
33:S.S. Rathore v. State of M.P., (1989) 4 SCC 582 : 1990 SCC
(L&S) 50; Union of India v. Har Dayal, (2010) 1 SCC 394; CLP
(India) (P) Ltd. v. Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd., (2020) 5 SCC 185
34: Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Clp India Pvt Ltd vs Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. on 6 May, 2020
33:S.S. Rathore v. State of M.P., (1989) 4 SCC 582 : 1990 SCC
(L&S) 50; Union of India v. Har Dayal, (2010) 1 SCC 394; CLP
(India) (P) Ltd. v. Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd., (2020) 5 SCC 185
34: Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.