Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 23 (0.33 seconds)Section 325 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 504 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Balraje @ Trimbak vs State Of Maharashtra on 10 May, 2010
(ii) The testimony of the injured witnesses has greater evidentiary value and unless exceptional circumstances exist their statements are not to be discarded lightly [See : State of M.P. vs. Mansingh, (2003) 10 SCC 414; Jarnail Singh v. State of Punjab, (2009) 9 SCC 719; Balraje @ Trimbak v. State of Maharashtra, (2010) 6 SCC 673; Abdul Sayeed vs. State of M.P., (2010) 10 SCC 259; State of U.P. vs. Naresh, (2011) 4 SCC 324; Laxman Singh vs. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) (2021) 9 SCC 191; Balu Sudam Khalde and another vs. State of Maharashtra, 2023 SCC OnLine SC 355)] and in the instant case the Magistrate while recording the statement of injured-opposite party No.2 has mentioned the date of incident as 01.01.2019, which could be inadvertently.
Section 155 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
State Of U.P vs Naresh And Ors on 8 March, 2011
(ii) The testimony of the injured witnesses has greater evidentiary value and unless exceptional circumstances exist their statements are not to be discarded lightly [See : State of M.P. vs. Mansingh, (2003) 10 SCC 414; Jarnail Singh v. State of Punjab, (2009) 9 SCC 719; Balraje @ Trimbak v. State of Maharashtra, (2010) 6 SCC 673; Abdul Sayeed vs. State of M.P., (2010) 10 SCC 259; State of U.P. vs. Naresh, (2011) 4 SCC 324; Laxman Singh vs. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) (2021) 9 SCC 191; Balu Sudam Khalde and another vs. State of Maharashtra, 2023 SCC OnLine SC 355)] and in the instant case the Magistrate while recording the statement of injured-opposite party No.2 has mentioned the date of incident as 01.01.2019, which could be inadvertently.
Balu Sudam Khalde vs The State Of Maharashtra on 29 March, 2023
(ii) The testimony of the injured witnesses has greater evidentiary value and unless exceptional circumstances exist their statements are not to be discarded lightly [See : State of M.P. vs. Mansingh, (2003) 10 SCC 414; Jarnail Singh v. State of Punjab, (2009) 9 SCC 719; Balraje @ Trimbak v. State of Maharashtra, (2010) 6 SCC 673; Abdul Sayeed vs. State of M.P., (2010) 10 SCC 259; State of U.P. vs. Naresh, (2011) 4 SCC 324; Laxman Singh vs. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) (2021) 9 SCC 191; Balu Sudam Khalde and another vs. State of Maharashtra, 2023 SCC OnLine SC 355)] and in the instant case the Magistrate while recording the statement of injured-opposite party No.2 has mentioned the date of incident as 01.01.2019, which could be inadvertently.
Section 200 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Abdul Sayeed vs State Of M.P on 14 September, 2010
(ii) The testimony of the injured witnesses has greater evidentiary value and unless exceptional circumstances exist their statements are not to be discarded lightly [See : State of M.P. vs. Mansingh, (2003) 10 SCC 414; Jarnail Singh v. State of Punjab, (2009) 9 SCC 719; Balraje @ Trimbak v. State of Maharashtra, (2010) 6 SCC 673; Abdul Sayeed vs. State of M.P., (2010) 10 SCC 259; State of U.P. vs. Naresh, (2011) 4 SCC 324; Laxman Singh vs. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) (2021) 9 SCC 191; Balu Sudam Khalde and another vs. State of Maharashtra, 2023 SCC OnLine SC 355)] and in the instant case the Magistrate while recording the statement of injured-opposite party No.2 has mentioned the date of incident as 01.01.2019, which could be inadvertently.