Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.21 seconds)Section 80B in Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
The Collector Of Customs, Calcutta And ... vs G. Dass And Co. And Ors. on 9 February, 1966
The construction of an Explanation, as was held in Collector of Customs v. G. Dass & Co., AIR 1966 SC 1577 must depend upon its terms and no theory of its purpose can be entertained unless it is to be inferred from the language used.
Burmah Shell Oil Storage And ... vs Commercial Tax Officer And Others on 27 September, 1960
It was said in Burmah Shell Oil Ltd. v. Commercial Tax Officer, AIR 1961 SC 315, that the explanation was meant to explain the Article and must be interpreted according to its own tenor and it was an error to explain the Explanation with the aid of the Article to which it was annexed."
Dattatraya Govind Mahajan & Ors. Etc vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr on 27 January, 1977
"We have to remember what was held in Dattatraya Govind Mahajan v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1977 SC 915 that mere description of a certain provision, such as "Explanation" is not decisive of its true meaning.
Hiralal Rattanlal Etc. Etc. vs State Of U.P. And Anr. Etc. Etc. on 3 October, 1972
It is true that the orthodox function of an explanation is to explain the meaning and effect of the main provision to which it is an explanation and to clear up any doubt or ambiguity in it, but ultimately it is the intention of the legislature which is paramount and mere use of a label cannot control or deflect such intention............ In Hiralal Ratanlal v. State of U.P., AIR 1973 SC 1034, it was ruled that if on a true reading of an Explanation it appears that it has widened the scope of the main section, effect be given to legislative intent notwithstanding the fact that
the legislature named that provision as an
Explanation. In all these matters Courts have
to find out the true intention of the legislature."
Kerala University Act, 1974
Section 3 in Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Section 76 in Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Bihta Co-Operative Development Cane ... vs The Bank Of Bihar & Ors on 12 October, 1966
"An explanation, as was found in Bihta Marketing Union v. Bank of Bihar, AIR 1967 SC 389 may only explain and may not expand or add to the scope of the original section.