Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.24 seconds)
Dr. Arun Kumar Rajak & Anr vs Dr. Bimal Prasad Singh & Ors on 15 July, 2016 cites

Arun Singh @ Arun Kumar Singh vs State Of Bihar And Ors on 7 March, 2006

Referring next to the opinion expressed in the case of Dr. Bimal Prasad Singh (supra), it was contended that the Chancellor has rightly withdrawn his order directing enquiry into the selection process, for, any decision or action of the selection committee not being an act of the University, is not amenable to the jurisdiction of the Chancellor. It is argued that the view of the learned single Judge stood affirmed by the Division Bench and, finally, by the Supreme Court in SLP (Civil) Nos.11529-11531 of 2011, when the Supreme Court, while affirming the view expressed by this Court, directed the University to make a fresh selection from amongst those, who had applied against the advertisement, dated 25.10.2008, strictly in accordance with the Statutes, Rules and Regulations and without being influenced by the direction of the writ Court present in the last portion of the order.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 61 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Hitendra Singh Bhupendrasingh & Ors vs Dr.P.D.Krishi Vidyapeeth By Reg.& Ors on 4 April, 2014

(b) Whereas Section 11 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Universities (Krishi Vidyapeeth) Act, 1983, empowers the Chancellor to cause an enquiry in any matter connected with the administration or finances of the University and it is, thus, the empowerment under the said Act, which led the Supreme Court to uphold the enquiry initiated by the Chancellor of Universities in the case of Hitendra Singh (supra); but I am afraid there is no such conferment on the Chancellor under the Act, in question, to enquire into any matter connected with the administration or the finances of the University.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 20 - T S Thakur - Full Document
1