Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 37 (2.12 seconds)

Gas Secure Solutions (India) Pvt. Ltd vs Regional P.F. Commissioner-I & Anr on 31 October, 2022

On the submission that Section 61 of the Act had to be read in consonance with the Objects and Reasons of the Act, and when the Gujarat Gas Ltd. Vs. P&NGRB & Anr. 17 of 41 [Judgement in A.No. 115 of 2023 & IA No. 2153 of 2022] Board had the power to frame regulations to carry out the purposes of the Act, it had framed the Regulations in accordance with the legislation, the Supreme Court held that they had already dealt with the purport of Section 11, adverted to the facet how the words "subject to" had to be interpreted, the functions of the Board and the provisions relating to exclusivity, definitions of "common carrier" and the "contract carrier"; Section 61 was a provision that enabled the Board to frame Regulations; if, on reading of the statute in its entirety, such a power did not flow, a delegated authority could not frame a regulation as that would not accord with the statutory provisions nor would it be for the purpose of carrying on the provisions of the Act; in the case at hand, the Board had not been conferred such a power as per Section 11 of the Act; that was the legislative intent; Section 61 enabled the Board to frame Regulations to carry out the purposes of the Act, and certain specific aspects had been mentioned therein; Section 61 should be read in the context of the statutory scheme; regulatory provisions should be read and applied keeping in view the nature and textual context of the enactment, as that was the source of power; on a scanning of the entire Act, and applying various principles, they found that the Act did not confer any such power on the Board and the expression "subject to" used in Section 22 made it a conditional one; it had to yield to other provisions of the Act; as the power to fix the tariff had not been given to the Board, it could not frame a Regulation which would cover the area pertaining to determination of network tariff for a city or local gas distribution network, and compression charge for CNG; and, as the entire Regulation centred around the said subject, the said Regulation deserved to be declared ultra vires.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - D K Sharma - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next