Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 25 (1.93 seconds)Article 342 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Marri Chandra Shekhar Rao vs Dean, Seth G.S. Medical College And Ors on 2 May, 1990
The
issuance of a caste certificate by the State of Uttarakhand, as in
the present case, cannot dilute the rigours of the Constitution
Bench Judgments in Marri Chandra Shekhar Rao (supra) and
Action Committee (supra).
Article 136 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 36 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Bir Singh vs Delhi Jal Board . on 30 August, 2018
46. The Supreme Court in the case of Bir Singh v. Delhi Jal Board,
(2018) 10 SCC 312 has held as under:
Ranjana Kumari vs The State Of Uttarakhand on 1 November, 2018
114. Thus, the conclusion drawn by the High Power Caste Scrutiny
Committee only on the basis of Jamabandi (Khasra) of village Khara,
Tahsil Tarn Taran, Distt. Amritsar is perverse and contrary to judgment
passed by Supreme Court in the case of Ranjana Kumari (Supra) as
well as other judgments.
Action Committee On Issue Of Caste ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr. on 18 July, 1994
4. Two Constitution Bench judgments of this Court in Marri
Chandra Shekhar Rao vs. Dean, Seth G.S. Medical College &
Ors. and Action Committee on Issue of Caste Certificate to
Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes in the State of
Maharashtra & Anr. vs. Union of India & Anr. have taken the
view that merely because in the migrant State the same caste is
recognized as Scheduled Caste, the migrant cannot be
recognized as Scheduled Caste of the migrant State.
Deepak @ Preetam Verma vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh Thr on 27 February, 2018
89. This Court in the case of Deepak @ Preetam Verma and another
vs. State of M.P. and another by order dated 11/9/2018 passed in
M.Cr.C. No.12592/2018 has held that parallel enquiry under Section 36
of CrPC during the pendency of investigation is not maintainable.