Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.38 seconds)
Vinayak Sharma vs Indian Coast Guard Through Its Director ... on 3 July, 2023 cites

Charles. K. Skaria vs Dr.C.Mathew on 19 March, 1980

37. Applying the dictum of Charles K. Skaria (Supra) and Dolly Chhanda (Supra) to the facts of the present case this Court finds that appointments for batch 01/2023 have already been done and all seats have already been filled, however, interest of justice would be met if one seat for petitioner is created with the batch 01/2023. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 230 - V R Iyer - Full Document

Ashok Chand Singhvi vs University Of Jodhpur & Ors on 18 January, 1989

In Ashok Chand Singhvi (Supra), wherein the Hon‟ble Supreme Court in view of the fact that University had by mistake granted admission to a candidate despite his being ineligible, held that the fault W.P.(C) 3134/2023 Page 11 of 21 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:ROSY MUNJAL Signing Date:03.07.2023 11:20 laid with the College and especially when the candidate had joined the classes, he cannot be made to suffer. In the present case also, respondents did not check the qualification status of the petitioner during various stages of examination, especially when respondents have asserted that the stage for verification of the documents was Stage-II examination.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 105 - M M Dutt - Full Document

Union Public Ser.Commn vs Gyan Prakash Srivastava on 30 November, 2011

In Union Public Service Commission (Supra), the Supreme Court held that UPSC is a constitutional body but its actions are not immune from judicial review. In the said case, the applicant /respondent had applied for the post of Legal Advisor-cum-Standing Counsel but had not enclosed copy of his Law degree, which was an essential. However, he had attached other certificates issued by other Government departments to show that he had worked for two different posts where degree in law was essential. The Supreme Court held that rejection of his application by the UPSC was arbitrary.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 8 - G S Singhvi - Full Document

Dr. Jaya Bajpai vs National Board Of Examination And Anr on 10 October, 2019

In DR. Shidore Shital Mhatardeo Vs. National Board Of Examination 2019 SCC OnLine Del 10444, this Court dealt with a case wherein a direction was sought to the National Board of Examination to allot seat to the petitioners therein pursuant to final round of counseling which was held on 21.06.2019, though one of the petitioner was able to obtain degree certificate on 24.06.2019 and the other 30.06.2019 i.e. after the cut-off date, allotted seat and observed and held as under:-
Delhi High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 5 - R Shakdher - Full Document
1