Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 48 (0.40 seconds)The Water (Prevention And Control Of Pollution) Act, 1974
Section 25 in The Water (Prevention And Control Of Pollution) Act, 1974 [Entire Act]
Section 26 in The Water (Prevention And Control Of Pollution) Act, 1974 [Entire Act]
Section 21 in The Water (Prevention And Control Of Pollution) Act, 1974 [Entire Act]
The Food Safety And Standards Act, 2006
Laxmi Narain Modi vs Union Of India & Ors on 30 January, 2014
(41) It is an admitted fact that the petitioner has not taken NOC from the District Magistrate, Unnao nor has obtained a re-validation of the said NOC in order to comply with the provisions of Government Order dated 07.07.2017, which are mandatory in nature having been issued pursuant to the dictum of the Apex Court in Common Cause vs. Union of India and others (supra) and Laxmi Narain Modi Vs. Union of India (supra), for running the modernized slaughterhouse. Therefore, the U.P. Pollution Control Board has rightly refused to grant 'consent to operate' by means of the impugned orders.
Section 21 in The Carriage by Air Act, 1972 [Entire Act]
Section 28 in The Water (Prevention And Control Of Pollution) Act, 1974 [Entire Act]
M/S Radha Krishan Industries vs The State Of Himachal Pradesh on 20 April, 2021
In Radha Krishan Industries v. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors (supra), wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court has summarized the principles governing the exercise of writ jurisdiction by the High Court in the presence of an alternate remedy. The Apex Court has observed as under :-