Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (1.18 seconds)
Bhavdeep Cooperative Housing Society ... vs State Of Gujarat on 7 March, 2024 cites

Daman Singh & Ors vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 4 April, 1985

53. By now it is well established position that once a person becomes a member of the Co-operative Society, he loses his individuality with the Society and he has no independent rights except those given to him by the statute and bye-laws. The member has to speak through the Society or rather the Society alone can act and speaks for him qua the rights and duties of the Society as a body (see : Daman Singh v. State of Punjab, reported in (1985) 2 SCC 670 : AIR 1985 SC 973).
Supreme Court of India Cites 31 - Cited by 230 - O C Reddy - Full Document

Binny Ltd. & Anr vs V. Sadasivan & Ors on 8 August, 2005

"48. The contention of Mr. Oza, learned Senior Advocate that there is no provision under the Gujarat Ownership Flats Act for providing summary eviction of a nonconsenting member unlike the provision under the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 or The Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971, providing for such eviction and as such Writ Court could not have issued a Writ of Mandamus to the contesting respondents to quit and handover vacant possession of their flats, is no doubt an attractive argument which requires to be brushed aside, inasmuch as the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Binny Ltd. and Anr. versus V. Sadasivan and Others reported in (2005) 6 SCC 657, has held that the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is empowered to issue Writ on the principles that it is a public law remedy and available against a body or persons performing public law function.
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 320 - K G Balakrishnan - Full Document
1   2 Next