Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.31 seconds)

Salem Advocate Bar Association,Tamil ... vs Union Of India on 2 August, 2005

Law is well settled that application for additional evidence under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure can be allowed only if plaintiff is able to show that the documents were not in his knowledge and that he could not produce the same at the time evidence was being led, despite due diligence. Hon'ble Apex court in Salem Advocate's Bar Association v. Union of India 2005(3) RCR (Civil) 530 observed as under:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 50 - Cited by 1674 - T Chatterjee - Full Document

Surya Dev Rai vs Ram Chander Rai & Ors on 7 August, 2003

Law is well settled in Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai and others 2004(1) RCR (Civil) 147 that mere error of fact or law cannot be corrected in the exercise of supervisory jurisdiction by this Court. This Court can interfere only when the error is manifest and apparent on the face of proceedings such as when it is based on clear ignorance or utter disregard of the provisions of law and a grave injustice or gross failure of justice has occasioned thereby.
Supreme Court of India Cites 25 - Cited by 3621 - R C Lahoti - Full Document
1