Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 20 (0.36 seconds)

Suraj Mall Mohta And Co vs A. V. Visvanatha Sastri And Another on 28 May, 1954

The result of this decision was that the Commission was restrained from dealing with Mohta's case. The provisions of section 5(1) 792 of the Act were also attacked in that case as contravening article 14 of the Constitution, but the Court refrained from expressing any opinion about their constitutionality as that question had no relevancy then. The consequence of that decision was that a certain provision of Act XXX of 1947 was declared void and unenforceable to the extent of its repugnancy to the provisions of Part III of the Constitution under article 13(1) thereof Its validity however during the pre-Constitution period was beyond question.
Supreme Court of India Cites 44 - Cited by 199 - M C Mahajan - Full Document
1   2 Next