Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.32 seconds)

Arumugham (Dead) By Lrs. And Ors vs Sundarambal And Anr on 29 April, 1999

15. So far as the second substantial question of law whether the learned lower appellate court has committed grave error of law in reversing the judgment of trial court without meeting the grounds given by the trial court in dismissing the suit is concerned, it is a settled principle of law that the judgment of First Appellate Court cannot be reversed on the ground that the First Appellate Court had not come with the reasoning of the Trial Court, as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Arumugham (dead) by L. Rs. and others v. Sundarambal and another reported in AIR 1999 SC 2216, paragraph 14 of which, reads as under :-
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 74 - Full Document

Srimati Rani Hemanta Kumari Devi And ... vs Maharaja Jagadindra Nath Roy Bahadur on 8 January, 1920

The aforesaid judgment of this Court in Ramachandra Ayyar's case (AIR 1963 SC 302) specifically distinguished Rani Hemanta Kumar Debi v. Maharaja Jagadindra Nath Roy Bahadur, (1906) 16 Mad LJ 272 (PC) rendered by the Privy Council on the ground that that was a case wherein the High Court was dealing with a first appeal. The observations made by the Privy Council in that context would not be applicable to cases where the second appellate Court was dealing with the correctness of the 12 Second Appeal No. 58 of 2014 judgment of the first appellate court which reversed the trial Court."
Calcutta High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 55 - Full Document
1