Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 22 (0.38 seconds)Section 366 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 363 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Narender Kumar vs State(N.C.T.Of Delhi) on 25 May, 2012
28. The principles of law laid down in case,
Narender Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2012 (5) LRC 137
(SC) also support the case of defence. The Apex Court
observed that:
Suresh N. Bhusare And Ors vs State Of Maharashtra on 11 August, 1998
"17. Where evidence of the prosecutrix is found suffering
from serious infirmities and inconsistencies with other
material, prosecutrix making deliberate improvements on
material point with a view to rule out consent on her part
and there being no injury on her person even though her
version may be otherwise, no reliance can be placed upon
her evidence. (Vide: Suresh N. Bhusare & Ors. v. State of
Maharashtra, (1999) 1 SCC 220)."
Pardeep @ Sonu vs State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) on 25 March, 2011
31. My decision on this aspect finds support by the
principles of law laid down in case Sonu v. State (NCT) of
Delhi, 2010 [2] JCC 1337 wherein Delhi High Court
observed that:
S. Varadarajan vs State Of Madras on 9 September, 1964
13. Prosecurtix having herself accompanied the appellant
to his village staying with him for about one week, it
cannot be said that appellant had taken her away from the
protection of her lawful guardian within the meaning of
Section 361 IPC. Reliance is also placed on S. Veradarajan
SC No.110/13 State vs. Rajan Page 19 of 23
vs. State of Madras, reported in AIR 1965 SC 942.
Babu Lal And Ors vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 31 October, 2003
32. The other reasons which support my decision
that prosecution has failed to prove its case against
accused beyond reasonable suspicion and doubt are firstly
that there are material contradictions and inconsistencies
in the testimony of prosecutrix as enumerated here in
above and those have created doubt in the truthfulness of
the prosecution case. My decision in this regard finds
support by principles of law laid down in a case Babu Lal
and Others v. State, 1994 JCC 111 wherein, the Delhi High
Court observed that:
Ashok Narang vs State on 12 January, 2012
34. Secondly, my attention goes to a case Ashok
Narang v. State, 2012 [1] JCC 482 wherein the Delhi High
Court observed that: