Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.38 seconds)

The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M/S. Tata Elxsi Ltd on 30 August, 2011

"17. The similar nature of controversy, akin this case, arose before the Karnataka High Court in CIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd. [2012] 204 Taxman 321/17/taxman.com 100/349 ITR 98. The issue before the Karnataka High Court was whether the Tribunal was correct in holding that while computing relief under Section 10A of the IT Act, the amount of communication expenses should be excluded from the total turnover if the same are reduced from the export turnover? While giving the answer to the issue, the High Court, inter-alia, held that when a particular word is not defined by the legislature and an ordinary meaning is to be attributed to it, the said ordinary meaning is to be in conformity with the context in which it is used. Hence, what is excluded from 'export turnover' must also be excluded from 'total turnover', since one of the components of 'total turnover' is export turnover. Any other interpretation would run counter to the legislative intent and would be impermissible.
Karnataka High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 431 - Full Document

Tata Elxsi Ltd. vs Asstt. Cit on 16 October, 2007

In view of the findings of the co-ordinate bench of the Tribunal in the case of Kodiak Network India Pvt. Ltd., [supra], we hold that 12 companies out of 13 sought by the assessee are required to be excluded from the list of comparables where as the company Bodhtree Consulting Ltd., is accepted as a good comparable of software development services provided by the assessee. Accordingly, we direct the TPO/A.O to exclude 12 companies as mentioned in para 25 of the order of the co-ordinate bench [supra] from the set of comparables and recomputed the ALP after considering the claim of risk adjustment as well as the benefit of tolerance range of +/- 5% as per the proviso to section 92C(2)."
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 18 - Cited by 70 - Full Document
1