Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.18 seconds)
Kamla Palace vs State Of U.P. And Others on 12 October, 2000 cites

M/S Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Co. ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Ors on 12 December, 1978

10. Answer to the aforesaid question would depend on the applicability of the principles of promissory estoppel. If we come to the conclusion that the doctrine of promissory estoppel is attracted in the present case, then the petitioner shall be entitled to grant-in-aid under the amended G. O. dated 18.7.1989, otherwise not. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Pawan Alloys and Casting Put. Ltd. (supra), after examining the various decision on the issue of promissory estoppel, has held as follows :
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 1143 - P N Bhagwati - Full Document

Pawan Alloys And Casting Pvt. Ltd Meerut ... vs U.P. State Electricity Board And Ors on 5 August, 1997

14. Thus, the respondents are bound by the incentives announced by the State Government in the Government Order dated 18.7.1989. The changed rates of the grant-in-aid as per G. O. dated 14.7.1992. would be applicable only where a person decides to construct the new cinema building on or after 14.7.1992 and applies for grant of permission under Rule 3 of the Rules on or after that date. The decisions relied upon by the learned standing counsel, have all been considered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Pawan Alloys and Casting Pvt. Ltd. (supra), and after considering the same the Hon'ble Supreme Court had laid down the above principles.
Supreme Court of India Cites 25 - Cited by 117 - S B Majmudar - Full Document
1