Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.19 seconds)
Srinivasa G Shetty vs A N Manjunath on 1 October, 2020 cites

Arvind Kumar Mishra vs New India Assurance Co. Ltd. & Anr on 29 September, 2010

27. While awarding compensation towards "loss of amenities", keeping in mind the principles laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Raj Kumar's case (supra), sum of Rs.30,000/- awarded by Tribunal is found to be meager, same is enhanced to Rs.1,00,000/-, as the petitioner would not be able to lead normal life and enjoy activities which he would have enjoyed like a common man.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 1045 - R M Lodha - Full Document

Yadava Kumar vs Div.Mangr.,National Insurance Co.L.& ... on 31 August, 2010

11. What requires to be assessed by the Tribunal is the effect of the permanent disability on the earning capacity of the injured; and after assessing the loss of earning capacity in terms of a percentage of the income, it has to be quantified in terms of money, to arrive at the future loss of earnings (by applying the standard multiplier method used to determine loss of dependency). We may however note that in some cases, on appreciation of evidence and assessment, the Tribunal may find that percentage of loss of earning capacity as a result of the permanent disability, is approximately the same as the percentage of permanent disability in which case, of course, the Tribunal will adopt the said percentage for determination of compensation. (See for example, the decisions of this Court in Arvind Kumar Mishra v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and Yadava Kumar v. National Insurance Co. Ltd.)
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 187 - Full Document
1