Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 27 (2.48 seconds)The Arbitration Act, 1940
Section 34 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
State Of Haryana & Ors vs M/S S.L.Arora & Company on 29 January, 2010
The appellants would contend that the decision in the S.L. Arora
case (supra) inadvertently and erroneously assumed that the aforementioned
cases would not be applicable to it. Since the decision in the S.L. Arora
case (supra) negated the above stated principle, the appellants would
contend that the said case would require reconsideration by a larger Bench
of this Court.
Mcdermott International Inc vs Burn Standard Co. Ltd. & Ors on 12 May, 2006
6. Shri K.K. Venugopal, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the
appellants herein, in the first instance, would submit that the decision in
the S.L. Arora case (supra) was incorrect in ignoring the earlier decisions
of this Court, namely the Three Circles case (supra), the McDermott case
(supra), the ONGC case (supra) and the Central Bank of India case (supra).
Central Bank Of India vs Ravindra And Ors on 18 October, 2001
6. Shri K.K. Venugopal, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the
appellants herein, in the first instance, would submit that the decision in
the S.L. Arora case (supra) was incorrect in ignoring the earlier decisions
of this Court, namely the Three Circles case (supra), the McDermott case
(supra), the ONGC case (supra) and the Central Bank of India case (supra).
Oil & Natural Gas Commission vs M/S Mc Clelland Engineers S.A on 23 April, 1999
The High Court on this question has also rightly relied on a decision of
this Court in the case of Oil and Natural Gas Commission v. M.C. Clelland
Engineers S.A. (1999) 4 SCC 327. That being the position, we are unable to
find any ground to set aside the judgment of the Division Bench of the High
Court while considering the ground of 'interest on interest'."