Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 25 (0.25 seconds)
Dipesh Manibhai Shah vs State Of Gujarat on 29 September, 2023 cites

Satyanarayan Laxminarayan Hegde And ... vs Millikarjun Bhavanappa Tirumale on 25 September, 1959

"34. It is a well settled principle of law, that in the guise of exercising jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the High Court cannot convert itself into a court of appeal. It is equally well settled, that the supervisory jurisdiction extends to keeping the subordinate tribunals within the limits of their authority and seeing that they obey the law. It has been held, that though the powers under Article 227 are wide, they must be exercised sparingly and only to keep subordinate courts and Tribunals within the bounds of their authority and not to correct mere errors. Reliance in this respect can be placed on a catena of judgments of this Court including the ones in Satyanarayan Laxminarayan Hegde & Ors. vs. Millikarjun Bhavanappa Tirumale, Bathutmal Raichand Oswal vs. Laxmibai R.10 (1960) 1 SCR 890 37 Tarta & Anr.11, M/s India Pipe Fitting Co. vs. Fakruddin M. A. Baker & Anr.12, Ganpat Ladha v. Sashikant Vishnu Shinde, Mrs. Labhkuwar Bhagwani Shaha & Ors. vs. Janardhan Mahadeo Kalan & Anr., Chandavarkar Sita Ratna Rao vs. Ashalata S. Guram, Venkatlal G. Pittie and another vs. Bright Bros (Pvt.) Ltd., State of Maharashtra vs. Milind & Ors., State Through Special Cell, New Delhi vs. Navjot Sandhu Alias Afshan Guru and others, Ranjeet Singh vs. Ravi Prakash, Shamshad Ahmad & Ors. vs. Tilak Page 26 of 27 Downloaded on : Fri Sep 29 20:44:57 IST 2023 NEUTRAL CITATION C/SCA/13748/2006 CAV JUDGMENT DATED: 29/09/2023 undefined Raj Bajaj (Deceased) Through LRs.
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 568 - Full Document

Babhutmal Raichand Oswal vs Laxmibai Raghunath Tarte on 19 November, 1971

"34. It is a well settled principle of law, that in the guise of exercising jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the High Court cannot convert itself into a court of appeal. It is equally well settled, that the supervisory jurisdiction extends to keeping the subordinate tribunals within the limits of their authority and seeing that they obey the law. It has been held, that though the powers under Article 227 are wide, they must be exercised sparingly and only to keep subordinate courts and Tribunals within the bounds of their authority and not to correct mere errors. Reliance in this respect can be placed on a catena of judgments of this Court including the ones in Satyanarayan Laxminarayan Hegde & Ors. vs. Millikarjun Bhavanappa Tirumale, Bathutmal Raichand Oswal vs. Laxmibai R.10 (1960) 1 SCR 890 37 Tarta & Anr.11, M/s India Pipe Fitting Co. vs. Fakruddin M. A. Baker & Anr.12, Ganpat Ladha v. Sashikant Vishnu Shinde, Mrs. Labhkuwar Bhagwani Shaha & Ors. vs. Janardhan Mahadeo Kalan & Anr., Chandavarkar Sita Ratna Rao vs. Ashalata S. Guram, Venkatlal G. Pittie and another vs. Bright Bros (Pvt.) Ltd., State of Maharashtra vs. Milind & Ors., State Through Special Cell, New Delhi vs. Navjot Sandhu Alias Afshan Guru and others, Ranjeet Singh vs. Ravi Prakash, Shamshad Ahmad & Ors. vs. Tilak Page 26 of 27 Downloaded on : Fri Sep 29 20:44:57 IST 2023 NEUTRAL CITATION C/SCA/13748/2006 CAV JUDGMENT DATED: 29/09/2023 undefined Raj Bajaj (Deceased) Through LRs.
Bombay High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 265 - Full Document

India Pipe Fitting Co vs Fakruddin M.A. Baker And Anr on 4 November, 1977

"34. It is a well settled principle of law, that in the guise of exercising jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the High Court cannot convert itself into a court of appeal. It is equally well settled, that the supervisory jurisdiction extends to keeping the subordinate tribunals within the limits of their authority and seeing that they obey the law. It has been held, that though the powers under Article 227 are wide, they must be exercised sparingly and only to keep subordinate courts and Tribunals within the bounds of their authority and not to correct mere errors. Reliance in this respect can be placed on a catena of judgments of this Court including the ones in Satyanarayan Laxminarayan Hegde & Ors. vs. Millikarjun Bhavanappa Tirumale, Bathutmal Raichand Oswal vs. Laxmibai R.10 (1960) 1 SCR 890 37 Tarta & Anr.11, M/s India Pipe Fitting Co. vs. Fakruddin M. A. Baker & Anr.12, Ganpat Ladha v. Sashikant Vishnu Shinde, Mrs. Labhkuwar Bhagwani Shaha & Ors. vs. Janardhan Mahadeo Kalan & Anr., Chandavarkar Sita Ratna Rao vs. Ashalata S. Guram, Venkatlal G. Pittie and another vs. Bright Bros (Pvt.) Ltd., State of Maharashtra vs. Milind & Ors., State Through Special Cell, New Delhi vs. Navjot Sandhu Alias Afshan Guru and others, Ranjeet Singh vs. Ravi Prakash, Shamshad Ahmad & Ors. vs. Tilak Page 26 of 27 Downloaded on : Fri Sep 29 20:44:57 IST 2023 NEUTRAL CITATION C/SCA/13748/2006 CAV JUDGMENT DATED: 29/09/2023 undefined Raj Bajaj (Deceased) Through LRs.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 93 - P K Goswami - Full Document

Ganpat Ladha vs Sashikant Vishnu Shinde on 21 February, 1978

"34. It is a well settled principle of law, that in the guise of exercising jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the High Court cannot convert itself into a court of appeal. It is equally well settled, that the supervisory jurisdiction extends to keeping the subordinate tribunals within the limits of their authority and seeing that they obey the law. It has been held, that though the powers under Article 227 are wide, they must be exercised sparingly and only to keep subordinate courts and Tribunals within the bounds of their authority and not to correct mere errors. Reliance in this respect can be placed on a catena of judgments of this Court including the ones in Satyanarayan Laxminarayan Hegde & Ors. vs. Millikarjun Bhavanappa Tirumale, Bathutmal Raichand Oswal vs. Laxmibai R.10 (1960) 1 SCR 890 37 Tarta & Anr.11, M/s India Pipe Fitting Co. vs. Fakruddin M. A. Baker & Anr.12, Ganpat Ladha v. Sashikant Vishnu Shinde, Mrs. Labhkuwar Bhagwani Shaha & Ors. vs. Janardhan Mahadeo Kalan & Anr., Chandavarkar Sita Ratna Rao vs. Ashalata S. Guram, Venkatlal G. Pittie and another vs. Bright Bros (Pvt.) Ltd., State of Maharashtra vs. Milind & Ors., State Through Special Cell, New Delhi vs. Navjot Sandhu Alias Afshan Guru and others, Ranjeet Singh vs. Ravi Prakash, Shamshad Ahmad & Ors. vs. Tilak Page 26 of 27 Downloaded on : Fri Sep 29 20:44:57 IST 2023 NEUTRAL CITATION C/SCA/13748/2006 CAV JUDGMENT DATED: 29/09/2023 undefined Raj Bajaj (Deceased) Through LRs.
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 124 - M H Beg - Full Document
1   2 3 Next