Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.23 seconds)
State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. Home & ... vs Vishal Singh on 3 February, 2020 cites

Vineet Kumar Mishra vs State Of U.P. on 12 September, 2019

Considering the aforesaid so also the fact that the writ petitioner had participated in the physical examination, whereas in Vineet Kumar Misra (supra), the writ petitioner had not participated in the examination as he was suffering from Jaundice, we are of the view that the learned Writ Court has erred in granting the benefit of the order dated 26.04.2017 (Supra) to the writ petitioner.
Allahabad High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 24 - R Dikshit - Full Document

Mamta Shukla And Anr. vs State Of U.P. And Anr. on 10 December, 2019

In view of the above, we set-aside the impugned judgment and order dated 11.04.2019 passed in Service Single No.10180 of 2019 : Mamta Shukla vs. State of U.P. and others, and remit the matter to the learned Writ Court for deciding it afresh, in accordance with law, on merit. Learned counsel for the appellants is directed to file counter affidavit in Service Single No.10180 of 2019 within six weeks.
Allahabad High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 9 - M R Chauhan - Full Document
1