Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.21 seconds)

Kusum Sharma & Ors vs Batra Hospital &Med.Research Centre ... on 10 February, 2010

21. In case of 'medical negligence', the issue for consideration is to examine as to whether the treating doctor was sufficiently qualified to provide treatment and doctor was sufficiently competent and he has also observed due and necessary precaution. It is also necessary to know as to whether timely/necessary steps for treating the patient were taken or not? The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Kusum Sharma v. Batra Hospital reported in (2010) 3 SCC 480 has held in Para-94 as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 19 - Cited by 225 - D Bhandari - Full Document

Shah Hospital & 2 Ors. vs Daljeet Kaur & Anr. on 31 August, 2020

Learned counsel submits that District Commission has passed the order by overlooking the reply of appellants/OPs that there was no pain or numinous in the leg but there was only back pain. It is apparent from the OPD record, which was recorded at the instance of the complainant, he was having low back ache with stiffness. At the end, learned counsel for the appellants submits that there was no negligence on the part of the appellants. Learned counsel for the appellants has relied upon judgments i.e. (1)"Martin F Dasuja Vs. Mohammad Ishfaq" Civil Appeal No.3541 of 2002, decided on 17.02.2009 (SC), (2) "Eckersley Vs. Binnie" (1988) 18 Con LR 1, (3)"Hunter Vs. Hanley" 1955 SLT 213, (4) "Jacob Mathew (Dr) Vs. State of Punjab & another" III 2005(CPJ)9(SC), (5) "Malay Kumar Ganguly Vs. Sukumar Mukharjee" (2009) CPJ 17 (6) "Vinod Jain Vs. Santokba Durlabhji Memorial Hospital and another" (2019)12 SCC First Appeal No.68 of 2019 8 229, (7) "Shah Hospital & 2 others Vs. Daljeet Kaur & another"
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 1 - Cited by 2 - R K Agrawal - Full Document

Sandeep Singh Sandhu vs Amarjit Kaur Brar on 22 December, 2009

Respondent No.1/complainant has not only suffered physical pain but also suffered mental torture and had to incur a lot of expenses towards treatment. By considering all these factors, the District Commission has rightly awarded the amount of compensation as well as litigation expenses First Appeal No.68 of 2019 9 and no interference is required. Learned counsel has relied upon judgments i.e. (1) "Dr. Sandeep Singh Sandhu Vs. Amarjit Kaur & others" 2018(3)CLT 466 (Punjab), (2) "Yashmeen Kaur Vs. Moga Medicity (Multispecialty Hospital" 2017(3) CLT 204 (Punjab) (3) "Krishan Rao Vs. Nikhil Super Specialty Hospital" 2010(2)(Civil) 929(SC), (4) "Martin F D'souza Vs. Mohd. Ishfaq" 1995(6)SCC 651 in support of his arguments.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 2 - R Bindal - Full Document
1