Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.20 seconds)Section 15 in The Punjab Courts Act, 1918 [Entire Act]
Gangagir Chela vs Rasal Singh And Anr. on 3 March, 1965
6. In my opinion there is no merit in the contention advanced on behalf of the petitioner. Gangagir's case (AIR 1965 Punj 472) (supra) was a case which was tried by the Additional District Judge, his competency to try the suit was questioned and it was in that context that it was said that the suit had not only to be instituted assuming that the suit could only be instituted in the Court of principal Civil Court of original jurisdiction, i.e., the District Judge but had also to be tried by him unless he exercised authority conferred on him under the provisions of S. 21 of the Punjab Courts Act and S. 76 of the Pepsu Judicature Ordinance and was to transfer the case for trial to the Additional District Judge. Relevant provision of S. 92 of the Code is in the following terms :--
1