Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.28 seconds)Raghunath Laxman Wani And Ors vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 6 August, 1971
33. Learned A.P.P. Submitted that, in view of the ratio of the
case of Laxman Vs. State of Maharashtra (supra) and in view of
observations made by the Apex Court in the case Ashabai and
Another Vs. State of Maharashtra ( A IR 2013 Supreme Court 341
.
Paparambaka Rosamma & Ors vs State Of Andhra Pradesh on 13 September, 1999
In the case of Paparambaka Rosamma And Others Vs.
State of A.P (1999) 7 Supreme Court Cases 695 ) the Apex Court
has held that certificate given by the doctor about consciousness was
not sufficient and the certificate regarding fitness of mind ought to
have been there.
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 32 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Uka Ram vs State Of Rajasthan on 10 April, 2001
In the case of Uka Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan ( (2001) 5
Supreme Court Cases 254 ) the Apex Court has laid down that for
placing reliance on evidence of dying declaration the Court should be
satisfied about its trustworthiness and voluntary nature and fitness
of mind of the deceased. There cannot be dispute over this
proposition.
1