Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.45 seconds)Section 6 in The Societies Registration Act, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Societies Registration Act, 1860
Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959
M.S.V. Raja & Anr vs Seeni Thevar & Ors on 14 August, 2001
(ii) The unreported decision of the Honourable Apex Court in M.S.V.Raja &
Another v. Seeni Thevar & Others in Civil Appeal No.2417 of 1992, wherein the
same point set out supra has been posited by the Honourable Apex Court.
Section 96 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Ranganatha Pillai And 11 Ors. vs The Commissioner For Hindu Religious ... on 8 January, 1979
"21. The learned Counsel for the appellant cited the decision reported in
Ranganatha Pillai v. The Commissioner for H.R&C.E, (1979) 2 M.L.J 23 wherein
S.Mohan,J., as he then was, held as follows:
The Roman Catholic Mission vs State Of Madras And Another on 14 January, 1966
In the decision reported in The Roman Catholic Mission v. The State of
Madras, (1967) I MLJ 119, the Supreme Court has clearly observed that the Inam
Fair Register incorporated an official declaration which was the result of
detailed inquiries and all evidence collected in respect of each inam was
carefully sifted and considered before any conclusion was reached or declared
and in the absence of positive and proper evidence to the contrary, such
declaration must possess supreme importance. In the instant case, Ex.A.4, the
Inam Fair Register, which could not be filed before the 1st respondent, was
filed before the trial Court and the entries therein would show that the suit
temple is an ancient temple and grant has also been made and conferred on the
temple at the time of settlement of minor inams. As already noticed, there is
no positive and proper evidence to the contrary. As such, the declaration made
under Ex.A.4, as indicated by the Supreme Court, must possess supreme
importance.
Devaki vs Hindu Religious And Charitable ... on 17 March, 1997
25. The precedent of this Court in Devaki v. The Hindu Religious and
Charitable Endowments Department reported in 1997 II MLJ 331, could fruitfully
be referred to. Certain excerpts from it, could be extracted hereunder:
1