Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.37 seconds)State Of Rajasthan vs Rajendra Kumar Rawat And Ors. on 25 November, 1987
In
this regard, we rely on the definition of this term, as
propounded in State of Rajasthan v. Rawat Singh
(supra).
Article 312 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 19 in The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
State Of Gujarat vs Patel Raghav Natha & Ors on 21 April, 1969
In this
connection, the learned counsel placed reliance on the
judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
State of Gujarat v. Patil Raghav Natha, [(1969) 2
SCC 187].
V.C., Banaras Hindu University & Ors vs Shrikant on 12 May, 2006
6. The learned counsel of the applicant further
submitted that respondent no.1 was deliberately
frustrating the orderly assumption of charge by the
applicant and when the applicant got herself self-
relieved pursuant to Annexure A-9 order of the DOPT,
the same has been held as a misconduct by the
applicant for which the impugned charge-sheet has
been issued to her. Hence, the impugned action of
respondent no.1 was violative of Article 14 of the
Constitution of India, as held by the Hon'ble Supreme
Court in the case of Vice Chancellor, Banaras Hindu
University & Others v. Shrikant, [(2006) 11 SCC
42].
Union Of India & Ors vs J. Ahmed on 7 March, 1979
i) Union of India v. J. Ahmed, [(1979) 2 SCC
A.L.Kalara vs The Project & Equipment Corporation Of ... on 1 May, 1984
ii) A.L. Kalra v. Project and Equipment
Corporation of India Ltd., [(1984 (3) SCC 316].
Inspector Prem Chand vs Govt. Of N.C.T. Of Delhi And Others on 5 April, 2007
iii) Inspector Prem Chand v. Govt. of NCT of
Delhi & Ors., [(2007) 4 SCC 566].
Dr. U.N. Biswas vs Union Of India & Ors. on 29 April, 1998
iv) Dr. U.N. Biaswas v. Union of India, [1998 (8)
SLR 08].