Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.69 seconds)

Priyanka Srivastava & Anr vs State Of U.P.& Ors on 19 March, 2015

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners made the submission that learned Magistrate passed the order without taking into consideration whether the requirements of the judgment of the PRIYANKA SRIVASTAVA AND ANOTHER VS. STATE OF UP AND OTHERS reported in AIR 2015 SC 1758 case are complied with or not. It is also his submission that while referring the matter to the police, there is no application of mind by the learned Magistrate and it is only a mechanical order passed by the learned 5 Magistrate referring the matter to the police and report. Even on the merits also, he made the submission that the complainant has not made out the case on the alleged offences. It is the abuse of process of the Court. On these grounds learned counsel for the petitioners sought to allow the petition and to quash the proceedings.
Supreme Court of India Cites 32 - Cited by 1448 - D Misra - Full Document
1   2 Next