Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.18 seconds)Article 18 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 34 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
M/S Geo Miller & Co.Pvt.Ltd. vs Chairman, Rajasthan Vidyut Utpadan ... on 3 September, 2019
In Geo Miller & Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. Chairman, Rajasthan Vidyut
Utpadan Nigam Ltd: (2020) 14 SCC 643, the Supreme Court had
reiterated that mere correspondence by a party by writing letters and
reminders does not extend the period of limitation. It is, thus, necessary
for the parties to invoke arbitration within a period of three years from
the date when the cause of action arises. However, if the parties are in
bona fide negotiations to resolve the disputes, the date on which the
'breaking point' is reached would be the date on which the cause of
action arises. The Supreme Court had also emphasised that in such
cases, the entire history of negotiations would require to be placed on
record.
Section 16 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd. vs Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. on 9 September, 2021
In Delhi
Airport Metro Express Private Limited v Delhi Metro Rail
Corporation Limited: (2022) 1 SCC 131; the Supreme Court had
explained that even if it is accepted that the arbitral tribunal has
committed an error, the same would not vitiate the arbitral award on the
ground of patent illegality. The ground of patent illegality is available
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:Dushyant Rawal FAO(COMM) No.197/2021 Page 9 of 10
Signing Date:05.12.2022
2022/DHC/005312
if it strikes at the root of the matter and is ex facie apparent on the face
of the record.
Section 21 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
1