Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.61 seconds)

State Of Maharashtra vs Sharadchandra Vinayak Dongre on 7 October, 1994

21. The court, while condoning delay has to record the reasons for its satisfaction, and the same must be manifest in the order of the court itself. The court is further required to state in its conclusion, while condoning such delay, that such condonation is required in the interest of justice. (Vide State of Maharashtra v. Sharadchandra Vinayak Dongre [AIR 1995 SC 231] and State of H.P. v. Tara Dutt [AIR 2000 SC 297].)
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 122 - Full Document

State Of Himachal Pradesh vs Tara Dutt And Anr on 19 November, 1999

21. The court, while condoning delay has to record the reasons for its satisfaction, and the same must be manifest in the order of the court itself. The court is further required to state in its conclusion, while condoning such delay, that such condonation is required in the interest of justice. (Vide State of Maharashtra v. Sharadchandra Vinayak Dongre [AIR 1995 SC 231] and State of H.P. v. Tara Dutt [AIR 2000 SC 297].)
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 111 - M B Shah - Full Document
1   2 Next