Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 40 (0.42 seconds)

Raghubar Dayal vs The Bank Of Upper India, Ltd. on 31 January, 1919

In the above judgment, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has also referred to an earlier judgment of the Privy Council in "Raghubar Dayal v. Bank of Upper India Ltd.- AIR 1919 PC 9" in which judgment also Privy Council while considering Section 153 of the Indian Companies Act, 1913 has taken the view that proceeding of the meeting under which compromise or arrangement was sanctioned by majority is binding provided the scheme does not fail to be subsequently sanctioned. Pricy Council in the said judgment laid down following:-
Bombay High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 29 - Full Document

Chitra Sharma vs Union Of India on 9 August, 2018

5. As you are also aware, amidst the progress in the Debt Realignment Plan. various orders were passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court against JAL. in the matter of Chitra Sharma & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors (Writ Petition Civil No. 744 of 2017) in relation to the insolvency proceedings of Jaypee Infratech Limited, a subsidiary of JAL. We further draw your attention to directions (d) and (v) and of the Supreme Court Orders dated 11-09-2017 and 10-01-2018 Company Appeal (AT) No. 197 of 2024 & I.A. No. 6806 of 2024 With Company Appeal (AT) No. 199 of 2024 & I.A. No. 6807 of 2024 16 respectively, the relevant extracts of which are provided below against the respective dates:
Supreme Court of India Cites 34 - Cited by 31 - D Y Chandrachud - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next