Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 40 (0.42 seconds)Section 230 in The Companies Act, 2013 [Entire Act]
Section 391 in The Companies Act, 2013 [Entire Act]
Section 232 in The Companies Act, 2013 [Entire Act]
Section 230 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
The Companies Act, 2013
The Companies Act, 1956
Section 391 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Raghubar Dayal vs The Bank Of Upper India, Ltd. on 31 January, 1919
In the above judgment, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has also referred
to an earlier judgment of the Privy Council in "Raghubar Dayal v. Bank of
Upper India Ltd.- AIR 1919 PC 9" in which judgment also Privy Council
while considering Section 153 of the Indian Companies Act, 1913 has taken
the view that proceeding of the meeting under which compromise or
arrangement was sanctioned by majority is binding provided the scheme
does not fail to be subsequently sanctioned. Pricy Council in the said
judgment laid down following:-
Chitra Sharma vs Union Of India on 9 August, 2018
5. As you are also aware, amidst the progress in the Debt
Realignment Plan. various orders were passed by the
Hon'ble Supreme Court against JAL. in the matter of Chitra
Sharma & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors (Writ Petition Civil
No. 744 of 2017) in relation to the insolvency proceedings of
Jaypee Infratech Limited, a subsidiary of JAL. We further
draw your attention to directions (d) and (v) and of the
Supreme Court Orders dated 11-09-2017 and 10-01-2018
Company Appeal (AT) No. 197 of 2024
& I.A. No. 6806 of 2024
With
Company Appeal (AT) No. 199 of 2024
& I.A. No. 6807 of 2024
16
respectively, the relevant extracts of which are provided
below against the respective dates: