Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 26 (0.33 seconds)Section 376 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 201 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 377 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Shankarlal Gyarasilal Dixit vs State Of Maharashtra on 17 December, 1980
23. That the underwears of the accused were seized on
September 27, 2003 when they were in jail and these articles
were sent for chemical examination is not in dispute. That the
evidence pertaining to chemical examination of underwears
shows that those underwears were found stained with human
semen and spermatozoa is also not in dispute. Mr. T.V.
George, learned counsel, however, strenuously urged that
merely because underwears were found stained with human
semen by itself cannot be used as an incriminating
circumstance against the accused. Learned counsel in this
regard placed reliance upon the following decisions: (1)
Shankarlal Gyarasilal Dixit vs. State of Maharashtra, (1981) 2
SCC 35; (2) Subhash Chand vs. State of Rajasthan (2002) 1
1
6
SCC 702 and Sadashiv Ramrao Hadbe vs. State of
Maharashtra And Anr., (2006) 10 SCC 92.