Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.20 seconds)

Rattan Lal vs State Of Punjab on 10 April, 1964

18 In view of this rule, while deposing, none of the prosecution witnesses has told that by what entry in register no. 11, they were on patrolling in the particular area. In the present case also, this provision has not been complied with by the prosecution witnesses. The relevant entries regarding the arrival and departure of the police officials has not been proved on record. It has been held in Rattan Lal Vs State 1987 (2) Crimes 29 the Hon'ble High Court held that ;
Supreme Court of India Cites 19 - Cited by 3912 - Full Document
1   2 Next