Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.42 seconds)The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
Section 8 in The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 7 in The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Article 142 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Sudhir Aggarwal And Anr. vs State Of Nct Of Delhi [Along With Crl. ... on 31 May, 2005
As a matter of abundant caution, it would also be
appropriate to mention that, drawing strengthen from
the order passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India
in case title as Sudhir Chaudhary Vs. NCT Delhi,
Criminal Appeal Nos. 700-201 of 2016(arising out of
SLP (Crl) Nos. 3009-3010 of 2015), decided on
29.07.2016, the text to be made to read by the accused
shall be intermixed with sufficient sentences from the
questioned text which may facilitate examination of
voice sample identification by him. The said text
shall be prepared by FSL, Chandigarh, themselves after
the Investigating Agency first provides them with the
questioned recording. The collection of voice sample
of the accused shall also be done at FSL, chandigarh,
in the presence of the expert as it would not only
provide them a controlled environment suitably collect
the voice sample, but it will also clear the
apprehension of the accused that the Investigating
Agency may play some mischievous role by collecting
voice sample.
Section 27 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Ritesh Sinha vs State Of U.P.& Anr on 7 December, 2012
“5. Two principal questions arose for determination of
the appeal which have been set out in the order of Ranjana
Prakash Desai, J. dated 7-12-2012 [Ritesh Sinha v. State
of U.P., (2013) 2 SCC 357]: in the following terms: