Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.48 seconds)

X vs The Principal Secretary Health And ... on 29 September, 2022

17. More recently, in the case of X v. The Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Government of NCT of Delhi, AIR 2022 SC 4917; this Court, in another three-judge Bench lead by Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J. (as the learned Chief Justice then was) observed that a woman can become pregnant by choice irrespective of her marital status. In case the pregnancy is warranted, it is equally shared by both the partners. However, in case of an unwanted or incidental pregnancy, the burden invariably falls on the pregnant woman affecting her mental and physical health. Article 21 of the Constitution recognizes and protects the right of a woman to undergo termination of pregnancy if her mental or physical health is at stake. Importantly, it is the woman alone who has the right over her body and is the ultimate decision-maker on the question of whether she wants to undergo an abortion.
Supreme Court of India Cites 119 - Cited by 47 - D Y Chandrachud - Full Document

Glenn Paul vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 5 November, 2014

In pursuance to the letter addressed to the Registrar General dated 23.08.2025 as per directions issued by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of In reference (suo moto) vs State of M.P. : Writ Petition No. 5184 of 2025 decided on 20.02.2025, cognizance was taken and the letter was treated as suo moto petition. Accordingly, this writ petition came up for consideration before this Court.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 664 - Full Document
1