Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.19 seconds)

Sukhdev Singh Alias Kaka vs State Of Punjab on 6 September, 2014

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the trial Court vide order dated 16.07.2020 (Annexure P-2) while allowing the application of the 1 of 3 ::: Downloaded on - 12-01-2023 06:39:38 ::: CRM-M-24075-2022 -2- petitioner for release of his vehicle i.e. Car Maruti Swift Dezire bearing registration No. PB-64-B-1014 on sapurdari, of which he is registered owner stated to be involved in the FIR in question, directed to furnish sapurdari bonds by way of cash surety/bank guarantee to the tune of Rs.10,00,000/-. The solitary prayer made by him in the present petition is that he being a poor person, is not in a position to furnish cash security/bank guarantee but is instead ready to furnish adequate solvent surety of the equal amount in the shape of property. He relies on the order dated 08.11.2019 passed by this Court in CRM-M-48284-2022, titled as Sukhdev Singh @ Kala Vs. State of Punjab, wherein instead of furnishing bank guarantee of Rs.5,50,000/-, the petitioner therein was permitted to furnish two solvent sureties of the equivalent amount.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 3 - K C Puri - Full Document

The State Of Kerala vs A.A.Ali on 14 August, 2018

As stated, the vehicle in question is no longer required by the police and if it remains in their custody, shall loose its value and utility. The petitioner, being a poor person, is unable to furnish the cash/bank guarantee for its release and in place of the same, is ready to furnish adequate solvent surety of the equal amount in the shape of property. Hon'ble The Supreme Court of India in the case of State of Kerala Vs. A. A. Ali, 2018 (4) RCR (Crl.) 112 had held that the Court should not insist on furnishing of the Bank guarantee in such like cases.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 12 - K Joseph - Full Document
1