Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.39 seconds)Section 11 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 18 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 23 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 17 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 2 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 6 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 28 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Vijay Cotton & Oil Mills Ltd vs The State Of Gujarat on 11 September, 1968
6. Learned senior counsel for the appellant has placed reliance upon the
judgment in the case of Shree Vijay Cotton & Oil Mills Ltd. vs. State of
Gujarat[1], particularly Paragraph 14 thereof. In paragraph 14 this court
pointed out the failure of the high Court in not appreciating the mandatory
provisions of Section 34 of the Act. That was a case of ordinary
acquisition as per provisions of the Act wherein amount of compensation was
determined in regular manner and not by any agreement. Further, there was
no resort to urgency clause in terms of Section 17 of the Act nor there was
any issue as to entitlement of interest under Section 34. The claim had
been wrongly denied by the District Judge on a reference under Section 18
and the High Court also rejected the same by dismissing the cross
objections as barred by limitation and on principle of res judicata. This
Court, in the facts of that case held that the land owner was entitled for
interest as per mandatory provisions of Section 34 of the Act. But the
defence in the present case is entirely different and is not affected by
the aforesaid judgment.