Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 32 (1.15 seconds)Section 28 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 41 in The Sale Of Goods Act, 1930 [Entire Act]
Section 42 in The Sale Of Goods Act, 1930 [Entire Act]
Section 31 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 31 in The Arbitration Act, 1940 [Entire Act]
The Limitation Act, 1963
Section 15 in The Sale Of Goods Act, 1930 [Entire Act]
Mahadeolal Kanodia vs The Administrator-General Ofwest ... on 20 April, 1960
Quoting from the case of Mahadeolal Kanodia Vs. Administrator General
of W. B. AIR 1960 SC 936 it held that the decision of a higher bench was
incumbent to be followed unless the Court or the Arbitral Tribunal was able
to distinguish it from a decision of another Division Bench. The learned
Arbitrators have distinguished the judgment of the Division Bench, Bombay
High Court from the judgment of the Division Bench of the Delhi High
Court on the ground of the expiration of the contract. The judicial
discipline set out by the Supreme Court has accordingly been followed.
Sterlite Industries (India) Limited vs Department Of Telecommunications on 3 July, 2006
In the absence of any prejudice as in the case
::: Downloaded on - 21/08/2014 23:49:10 :::
(25) (1) Arbp 398/14
of Sterlite (supra), there would be no cause for complaint. Consequently
the contention that the learned Arbitrators did not treat both parties
equally has to be rejected.