Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.38 seconds)
Veer Dev Singh vs State Of U.P. Through The Principal ... on 10 April, 2023 cites

Punjab National Bank And Ors vs Manjeet Singh And Anr on 29 September, 2006

"The question as to what extent, principles of natural justice are required to be complied with would depend upon the fact situation obtaining in each case. The principles of natural justice cannot be applied in vacuum. They cannot be put in any straitjacket formula. The principles of natural justice are furthermore not required to be complied with when it will lead to an empty formality. What is needed for the employer in a case of this nature is to apply the objective criteria for arriving at the subjective satisfaction. If the criterias required for arriving at an objective satisfaction stands fulfilled, the principles of natural justice may not have to be complied with...". (emphasis added) In Punjab National Bank and others Vs. Manjeet Singh and another (supra), Court held as under :
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 307 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Sachchida Nand Chaturvedi vs State Of U.P. Thru The Principle Secy. ... on 14 May, 2019

5. A perusal of the judgment in the case of Sachchida Nand Chaturvedi (supra) shows that this Court was called upon to adjudicate more or less the same case where the promotion of the petitioner in that case from Class-IV post to Junior Accounts Clerk was cancelled and he was reverted to the substantive post of Messenger. The relevant paragraphs of the judgment are extracted below :
Allahabad High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 2 - S Agarwal - Full Document

Union Of India vs Raghuwar Pal Singh on 13 March, 2018

8. As regards principle of natural justice, the Supreme Court in a catena of judgments in Union of India and another versus Raghuwar Pal Singh (2018)15 SCC 463, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan and others versus Ajay Kumar Das and others 2002(4) SCC 503, Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation and another versus S.G. Kotturappa AIR 2005 SC 1933, Punjab National Bank and others vs. Manjeet Singh and another AIR 2007 SC 262, P.D. Agrawal versus State Bank of India and others, has settled the law in this regard that an order is not to be interfered on the ground of principles of natural justice if in the given facts and circumstances of the case, that order was patently illegal. No principle of natural justice is required to be followed when it leads to an empty formality. The Supreme Court has observed in the judgments that observance of principles of natural justice is not an empty formality. Where only one conclusion is possible, this Court can decline to interfere in exercise of power under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India.
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 60 - A M Khanwilkar - Full Document

P.D. Agrawal vs State Bank Of India & Ors on 28 April, 2006

"The principles of natural justice were also not required to be complied with as the same would have been an empty formality. The court will not insist on compliance with the principles of natural justice in view of the binding nature of the award. Their application would be limited to a situation where the factual position or legal implication arising thereunder is disputed and not where it is not in dispute or cannot be disputed. If only one conclusion is possible, a writ would not issue only because there was a violation of the principle of natural justice." (emphasis added) In P.D. Agrawal Vs. State Bank of India and others (supra), it has been observed :
Supreme Court of India Cites 32 - Cited by 196 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Ors vs Ajay Kumar Das & Ors on 29 April, 2002

8. As regards principle of natural justice, the Supreme Court in a catena of judgments in Union of India and another versus Raghuwar Pal Singh (2018)15 SCC 463, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan and others versus Ajay Kumar Das and others 2002(4) SCC 503, Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation and another versus S.G. Kotturappa AIR 2005 SC 1933, Punjab National Bank and others vs. Manjeet Singh and another AIR 2007 SC 262, P.D. Agrawal versus State Bank of India and others, has settled the law in this regard that an order is not to be interfered on the ground of principles of natural justice if in the given facts and circumstances of the case, that order was patently illegal. No principle of natural justice is required to be followed when it leads to an empty formality. The Supreme Court has observed in the judgments that observance of principles of natural justice is not an empty formality. Where only one conclusion is possible, this Court can decline to interfere in exercise of power under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 45 - Full Document
1