Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (1.03 seconds)

K.R. Purushothaman vs State Of Kerala on 25 October, 2005

In this respect, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed in the case titled K.R. Purushothaman vs. State of Kerala, AIR 2006 SC 35 that to constitute a conspiracy, meeting of minds of two or more persons for doing an illegal act or an act by an illegal means is the first and primary condition and it is not necessary that all the conspirators must know each and every details of the conspiracy. The agreement amongst the conspirators can be inferred by necessary implications. In most of the cases, the conspiracies are proved by the circumstantial evidence, as the conspiracy and its objects are usually deduced from AC No.07/2009 CBI Vs. Prabhat Sitaram Kudwa etc. Page 16 of 41 the circumstances of the case and the conduct of the accused involved in the conspiracy. The criminal conspiracy is an independent offence in Indian Penal Code. The unlawful agreement is sine qua non for constituting offence under Indian Penal Code and not an accomplishment. Conspiracy consists of the scheme or adjustment between two of more persons which may be express or implied or partly express and partly implied. The offence of conspiracy shall continue till the termination of the agreement. 28 In another case titled Shivnarayan Laxminarayan Joshi Versus State of Maharashtra (reported in 1980 SCC (Cri.)
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 237 - P P Naolekar - Full Document
1   2 Next