Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.55 seconds)

Benson vs State Of Kerala on 3 October, 2016

In Benson's case (supra) the Hon'ble Apex Court held that the normal rule in Sub-Section (1) of Section 427 Cr.P.C. that if a person already undergoing a sentence of imprisonment is sentenced on a subsequent conviction to imprisonment, such subsequent term of imprisonment would normally commence at the expiration of the imprisonment to which he was previously sentenced, is subject to a qualification and it is within the powers of the Court to direct that the subsequent sentence shall run concurrently with the previous sentence. It was a case wherein the accused was convicted and sentenced in 12 cases of similar nature, of which accused was serving the sentence in respect of 8th crime. In the said circumstances, the Apex Court ordered that the sentence in remaining four cases shall run concurrently.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 50 - U U Lalit - Full Document
1