Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.25 seconds)
Harbansh Singh vs Railway on 21 September, 2022 cites

Union Of India & Anr vs Major Bahadur Singh on 22 November, 2005

All Ministries/departments are accordingly requested to ensure that any challenge to the existing instructions instructions of this Department in regard to the communication of adverse remarks in any court taking shelter in the Supreme Court judgement in UP Jal Nigam or any other judgement based on UP Jal Nigam judgement is properly defended keeping in view the above declaration of the Supreme Court in UOI vs. Major Bahadur Singh."
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 275 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Abhijit Ghosh Dastidar vs Union Of India & Ors on 22 October, 2008

23. It emerges from the aforesaid Supreme Court judgements in the cases of Dev Dutt (supra), Abhijit ijit Ghosh Dastidar (supra) and Sukhdev Singh (supra) and DoPT OMs that the APARs written after 2008-09 09 have to be communicated in full to the concerned officers. Once an APAR is communicated there is no need to communicate below benchmark grading separate separately.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 382 - Full Document
1