Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.42 seconds)Ashok Kumar Sharma & Others vs Chander Shekhar & Another on 10 March, 1997
A perusal of para
six of the referral order clearly shows that the Bench was
echoing the ratio of the three-judge Bench in Ashok Kumar
Sharma's case (supra) though there is no express reference to
the said case.
Divya vs Union Of India on 9 October, 2023
20. It is a settled principle of law that there is a sanctity to the last
date prescribed to compete as the qualification/eligibility is to be gain upto
the last date of submission of the application form. Not only this, in case a
candidate is eligible but has not fulfilled the requirement of the terms and
conditions of the Advertisement upto the last date, the said candidate is also
to be treated ineligible to compete for the post in question. The Hon'ble
Supreme Court of India in Writ Petition (C) No. 724 of 2023 titled as Divya
vs. Union of India and others, decided on 09.10.2023, has held that any
candidate who has not even submitted the certificate of a particular reserved
category to show eligibility to compete under the said category upto the last
date of submission of application, cannot be treated as eligible candidate.
Relevant paragraphs of the said judgment are as under:-
The State Of Bihar vs Madhu Kant Ranjan on 16 December, 2021
The relevant para of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of
India in Madhu Kant Ranjan's case (supra) to support the said information
is as under:-
The Indian Veterinary Council Act, 1984
A.P. Public Service Commission, ... vs B. Sarat Chandra & Ors on 10 April, 1990
" 51. In this case, rules clearly exist in the form of CSE-2022.
It has also been settled that determination of eligibility
cannot be left uncertain till the final stages of selection, since
that would lead to uncertainty. [See A.P. Public Service
Commission v. B. Sarat Chandra (1990)2 SCC 669, para 7]
Further, it is well settled that if rules prescribe the last date
on which eligibility should be possessed, any relaxation
would prejudice non-applicants who for want of possession of
eligibility would not have applied.
Himachal Pradesh State Electricity ... vs Dharminder Singh on 23 November, 2022
59. The attempt by Ms. Preetika Dwivedi and Shri K.
Parameshwar, learned counsels for the petitioners to get over
Gaurav Singh's case (supra) by relying on the case of Deepak
Yadav (supra) does not also impress us. Deepak Yadav case
(supra) pertained to the Civil Services Examination for 2020.
It was during the middle of the peak pandemic in 2020. In
that scenario, the Court observed as follows:-
1