Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.45 seconds)Section 320 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 182 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Shakuntala Sawhney vs Kaushalya Sawhney on 4 April, 1979
In Shakuntala Sawhney v Kaushalya Sawhney, (1979) 3 SCR 639, at P 642,
Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that the finest hour of Justice arises propitiously when
parties, who fell apart, bury the hatchet and weave a sense of fellowship or reunion.
Himachal Pradesh Cricket Association vs The State Of Himachal Pradesh on 2 November, 2018
In Himachal Pradesh Cricket Association v State of Himachal Pradesh, 2018 (4)
Crimes 324, Hon'ble Supreme Court holds "[47]. As far as Writ Petition (Criminal) No.
5 of 6
::: Downloaded on - 16-01-2022 02:46:57 :::
CRM-M-24555-2021 --6--
Section 482 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai ... vs The State Of Gujarat on 4 October, 2017
In Parbatbhai Aahir v State of Gujarat, (2017) 9 SCC 641, a three Judges Bench
of Hon'ble Supreme Court, laid down the broad principles for quashing of FIR, which
are reproduced as follows:-
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Ramgopal vs South Eastern Coalfields Limited 47 ... on 7 January, 2019
In Ramgopal v. The State of Madhya Pradesh, Cr.A 1489 of 2012, decided on
29.09.2021, Hon'ble Supreme Court holds,
[11]. True it is that offences which are 'non-compoundable' cannot be
compounded by a criminal court in purported exercise of its powers
under Section 320 Cr.P.C. Any such attempt by the court would amount
to alteration, addition and modification of Section 320 Cr.P.C, which is
the exclusive domain of Legislature. There is no patent or latent
ambiguity in the language of Section 320 Cr.P.C., which may justify its
wider interpretation and include such offences in the docket of
'compoundable' offences which have been consciously kept out as non-
compoundable. Nevertheless, the limited jurisdiction to compound an
offence within the framework of Section 320 Cr.P.C. is not an embargo
against invoking inherent powers by the High Court vested in it under
Section 482 Cr.P.C. The High Court, keeping in view the peculiar facts
and circumstances of a case and for justifiable reasons can press
Section 482 Cr.P.C. in aid to prevent abuse of the process of any Court
and/or to secure the ends of justice.