Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.66 seconds)The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 3 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 157 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Hardeep Singh vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 10 January, 2014
18) As already noted, in the instant case, the learned Special Judge
has not collected any additional material during the inquiry proceedings
and he has arraigned the petitioner as an accused on the basis of the
14
material submitted along with the charge sheet. The same, in view of
the foregoing discussion, is not in accordance with law. It appears that
the learned Special Judge has, while passing the impugned order, not
properly appreciated the ratio laid down by the Supreme Court in
Hardeep Singh's case (supra).
Section 208 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 227 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 207 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Manjeet Singh vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 28 August, 2020
14) The ratio laid down by the Supreme Court in Hardeep Singh's
case has been explained by the said Court in the case Manjeet Singh vs.
State of Haryana and Ors. (2021) SCC Online SC 632. The Supreme
Court after noticing its subsequent judgements on the issue,
summarized the scope and ambit of the powers of the Court under
Section 319 of the Cr. P. C in the following manner:
Section 13 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
1