Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.25 seconds)

Satyajit Banerjee And Others vs State Of West Bengal And Others on 23 November, 2004

Learned counsel for the accused-respondents in the revision petition also placed reliance on the judgment of the Supreme Court in Satyajit Banerjee v. State of West Bengal, 2005 (1) R.C.R. (Cr.) 723, in which it is held that direction for retrial should not be made by the High Court in all or every case where acquittal of accused is for want of Parmar Harpal Singh 2013.11.14 10:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh Cr. Appeal Nos.S-13-SB of 2003 etc. [13] adequate or reliable evidence. Direction for de novo trial could be given in extraordinary case where Court was convinced that entire trial was farce. I have gone through this judgment. The law laid down in this judgment fully applies to the facts of the present case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 188 - D M Dharmadhikari - Full Document

State Of M.P vs Dal Singh & Ors on 21 May, 2013

On the other hand, learned counsel for the revision petitioner in the revision petition placed reliance on the judgment of the Supreme Court in State of Madhya Pradesh v. Dal Singh and others, 2013 (3) R.C.R. (Cr.) 1. In this case, it is held that any person can record dying declaration, but the person who records a dying declaration must be satisfied that the maker is in a fit state of mind and is capable of making such a statement.
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 132 - B S Chauhan - Full Document

Govindappa & Ors vs State Of Karnataka on 11 May, 2010

Learned counsel for the revision petitioner in the revision petition also placed reliance on the judgment of the Supreme Court in Govindappa v. State of Karnataka, (2010) 6 SCC 533, in which it is held that the mere absence of medical certificate regarding condition of deceased by itself is not sufficient to discard the dying declaration. Medical certification is only a rule of caution. The person recording the dying declaration must be satisfied about fit state of mind of the patient. Both these citations will not apply in the case, as already discussed no doctor was examined, no time was given and no medical record was produced and at 1.00 p.m. her condition was critical etc.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 72 - P Sathasivam - Full Document
1   2 Next