Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 36 (0.34 seconds)
Fir No. 475/06; State vs . Raj Kumar @ Bindu Page 1 Of 38 on 30 April, 2012 cites

Roop Kishore Madan vs State on 14 December, 2000

The Ld. Defence counsel, in support of his arguments, has relied upon the judgements reported as Sanju @ Sanjay Singh Sengar Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh, 2002 (2) RCR (Criminal) 687; Laxmi & Anr. Vs. State, 85 (2000) DLT 319; Ramesh Chandra Vs. State of Rajasthan, 1997 (4) RCR (Criminal) 305; Roop Kishore Madan Vs. State, 89 (2001) DLT 150; M. Mohan Vs. State Tr. Dy. Supdt. of Police, 2011 (2) RCR (Criminal) 272; Ajay Singh Parveen & Anr. Vs. State of UT Chandigarh, 2011 (2) RCR (Criminal) 405; Ashwani Kumar Vs. State of Haryana, 2011 (1) RCR (Criminal) 108; Rajib Neog Vs. The State of Assam, 2011 (2) FIR No. 475/06; State Vs. Raj Kumar @ Bindu Page 6 of 38 RCR (Criminal) 43.
Delhi High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 17 - R S Sodhi - Full Document

M.Mohan vs State Tr.Dy.Supdt.Of Police on 1 March, 2011

The Ld. Defence counsel, in support of his arguments, has relied upon the judgements reported as Sanju @ Sanjay Singh Sengar Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh, 2002 (2) RCR (Criminal) 687; Laxmi & Anr. Vs. State, 85 (2000) DLT 319; Ramesh Chandra Vs. State of Rajasthan, 1997 (4) RCR (Criminal) 305; Roop Kishore Madan Vs. State, 89 (2001) DLT 150; M. Mohan Vs. State Tr. Dy. Supdt. of Police, 2011 (2) RCR (Criminal) 272; Ajay Singh Parveen & Anr. Vs. State of UT Chandigarh, 2011 (2) RCR (Criminal) 405; Ashwani Kumar Vs. State of Haryana, 2011 (1) RCR (Criminal) 108; Rajib Neog Vs. The State of Assam, 2011 (2) FIR No. 475/06; State Vs. Raj Kumar @ Bindu Page 6 of 38 RCR (Criminal) 43.
Supreme Court of India Cites 35 - Cited by 491 - D Bhandari - Full Document

Ajay Singh Parveen And Another vs State Of Ut Chandigarh on 13 January, 2011

The Ld. Defence counsel, in support of his arguments, has relied upon the judgements reported as Sanju @ Sanjay Singh Sengar Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh, 2002 (2) RCR (Criminal) 687; Laxmi & Anr. Vs. State, 85 (2000) DLT 319; Ramesh Chandra Vs. State of Rajasthan, 1997 (4) RCR (Criminal) 305; Roop Kishore Madan Vs. State, 89 (2001) DLT 150; M. Mohan Vs. State Tr. Dy. Supdt. of Police, 2011 (2) RCR (Criminal) 272; Ajay Singh Parveen & Anr. Vs. State of UT Chandigarh, 2011 (2) RCR (Criminal) 405; Ashwani Kumar Vs. State of Haryana, 2011 (1) RCR (Criminal) 108; Rajib Neog Vs. The State of Assam, 2011 (2) FIR No. 475/06; State Vs. Raj Kumar @ Bindu Page 6 of 38 RCR (Criminal) 43.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 5 - A Singh - Full Document

Ashwani Kumar @ Billoo vs State Of Haryana on 14 March, 2011

The Ld. Defence counsel, in support of his arguments, has relied upon the judgements reported as Sanju @ Sanjay Singh Sengar Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh, 2002 (2) RCR (Criminal) 687; Laxmi & Anr. Vs. State, 85 (2000) DLT 319; Ramesh Chandra Vs. State of Rajasthan, 1997 (4) RCR (Criminal) 305; Roop Kishore Madan Vs. State, 89 (2001) DLT 150; M. Mohan Vs. State Tr. Dy. Supdt. of Police, 2011 (2) RCR (Criminal) 272; Ajay Singh Parveen & Anr. Vs. State of UT Chandigarh, 2011 (2) RCR (Criminal) 405; Ashwani Kumar Vs. State of Haryana, 2011 (1) RCR (Criminal) 108; Rajib Neog Vs. The State of Assam, 2011 (2) FIR No. 475/06; State Vs. Raj Kumar @ Bindu Page 6 of 38 RCR (Criminal) 43.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 12 - J Singh - Full Document

Sohan Raj Sharma vs State Of Haryana on 7 April, 2008

Though FSL expert was not examined, yet FSL report is per se admissible u/s 293 Cr.P.C. Even otherwise, the accused had not disputed it anywhere in evidence. The Ld. APP for the State has argued that there is no contradictions in the testimony of PWs. The accused cannot get the benefit of the minor contradictions in the statement of the aforesaid PWs, if any. The Ld. APP, in support of his arguments has relied upon the judgements reported as Sohan Raj Sharma Vs. State of Haryana 2007 (2) CC Cases (HC) 87; FIR No. 475/06; State Vs. Raj Kumar @ Bindu Page 7 of 38 Bhagwan Dass Vs. State (NCT) of Delhi 2011 III AD (CRI.)
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 117 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Bhagwan Dass vs State (Nct) Of Delhi on 9 May, 2011

Though FSL expert was not examined, yet FSL report is per se admissible u/s 293 Cr.P.C. Even otherwise, the accused had not disputed it anywhere in evidence. The Ld. APP for the State has argued that there is no contradictions in the testimony of PWs. The accused cannot get the benefit of the minor contradictions in the statement of the aforesaid PWs, if any. The Ld. APP, in support of his arguments has relied upon the judgements reported as Sohan Raj Sharma Vs. State of Haryana 2007 (2) CC Cases (HC) 87; FIR No. 475/06; State Vs. Raj Kumar @ Bindu Page 7 of 38 Bhagwan Dass Vs. State (NCT) of Delhi 2011 III AD (CRI.)
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 8248 - M Katju - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next