Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.22 seconds)The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Nedungadi Bank Ltd vs K.P. Madhavankutty And Ors on 28 January, 2000
Firestone Tyre And Rubber Co. Of India ... vs K.P. Krishnan And Ors. on 30 August, 1955
(v) AIR 1960 SC 1223 (V 47 C 215) [(1)State of Bombay
(now Maharashtra)(in C. A. No.37 of 1957); (2)
Firestone Tyre and Rubber Co., (in C. A. No.38 of
1957) vs. K. P. Krishnan & Ors.(In both the appeals)];
Aaj Kaal Publishers Pvt. Ltd. vs State Of West Bengal And Ors. on 10 October, 1991
(vii) 1992 (1) CHN 21 [M/s. Aaj Kaal Publishers Ltd. vs.
State of West Bengal & Ors.];
Gouri Sankar Chatterjee & Ors vs Texmaco Limited & Ors on 15 December, 2000
Secretary, Indian Tea Association vs Ajtt Kumar Barat And Ors on 14 February, 2000
- save and except that non-payment of PF and ESI, if any, by HBT - it had no
liability. The process of cargo handling was a continuous process and if the
contractor / agency was changed, the workers / employees remain the same. This is
the convention and usages in KoPT and is still in practice for more than three
decades. That apart, it is under Haldia Dock Complex premises that control and
cargo operations are carried out. So, KoPT cannot shake off their responsibilities
towards their workmen. Several judgements of the Supreme Court had been referred
to and relied upon on behalf of the workers' union, which included (i) AIR 1953 SC
53 (Vol. 40, C. N.15) [The State of Madras vs. C. P. Sarathy & Anr.]; (ii) 2000(1)
SC 454 [The Secretary Indian Tea Association vs. Ajit Kumar Barat & Ors.];
Shambu Nath Goyal vs Bank Of Baroda And Others on 27 September, 1983
(iii) (2002) 4 SCC 490 [Sharad Kumar vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.]; (iv)
AIR 1985 SC 860 [The M. P. Irrigation Karamchari Sangh vs. State of M. P. &
Anr.]; (v)2006 AIR SCW 1108 [ A. P. S. R. T. C. & Ors. vs. G. Srinivas Reddy &
Ors.]; (vi)AIR 1978 SC 1088 [Shambu Nath Goyal vs. Bank of Baroda]; (vii)
AIR 1978 SC 1410 [Hussainbhai vs. The Alath Factory Tezhilali Union & Ors.];
Telco Convoy Drivers Mazdoor Sangh & Anr vs State Of Bihar & Ors on 28 April, 1989
(viii)(1989) 3 SCC 271 [Telco Convoy Drivers Mazdoor Sangh & Anr. vs. State
of Bihar & Ors.]; (ix) 2008(4) CHN 592 [Birla Corporation Ltd.(Unit Soorah
Jute Mill) Sramik Union vs. Birla Corporation Ltd. & Ors.].
State Of Madras vs C. P. Sarathy And Another on 5 December, 1952
- save and except that non-payment of PF and ESI, if any, by HBT - it had no
liability. The process of cargo handling was a continuous process and if the
contractor / agency was changed, the workers / employees remain the same. This is
the convention and usages in KoPT and is still in practice for more than three
decades. That apart, it is under Haldia Dock Complex premises that control and
cargo operations are carried out. So, KoPT cannot shake off their responsibilities
towards their workmen. Several judgements of the Supreme Court had been referred
to and relied upon on behalf of the workers' union, which included (i) AIR 1953 SC
53 (Vol. 40, C. N.15) [The State of Madras vs. C. P. Sarathy & Anr.]; (ii) 2000(1)
SC 454 [The Secretary Indian Tea Association vs. Ajit Kumar Barat & Ors.];